Hi, Im noor hakim from UIR class P09
What ive found out about the integrated resorts in Singapore is that by the year 2015, Singapore is targeting to attract 17 million visitors and generate S$30 billion in tourism receipts. This is definitely good news fr the tourism sector and economy as a whole.
More hotel rooms will be needed to accomodate the tourist coming to Singapore. In terms of air capacity, the opening of Terminal 3 at Changi Airport willl boost our annual passenger handling capacity to 64 million, almost double the passengers handled by the airport last year..
In terms of manpower, the two IRs combined are expected to create some 50 000 to 60 000 jobs when the two IRs are fully functional.
To summarise, our tourism sector is set to enjoy a period of strong growth and set to become even more vibrant. Furthermore, more jobs will be created to solve the unemployment rate in Singapore.
Hi, I am Bang Zhou from UIR class P01
In conclusion, we must keep our moral and not destroy our social and moral fabric. The growth of IR will give more benefits than harm.
Hello, I'm Mindy from UIR P03
I have a question regarding the integrated resorts in Singapore.
As we all know that there is 1 project singapore is working on recently which has a casino. It is understandable that singapore wants to earn or money and this casino is said to be able to increase the number of tourists and increase the annual GDP and will also help in employment. But casino is a place where people gamble and this will attract many gamblers to come to singapore. What will happen then? There are many positive impact but there is this 1 problematic negative impact that may cause trouble in Singapore. This will cause social impact on the community.
I know that people will have to pay $100 membership fee before they can enter the casino, but that amount isn't much. Gamblers can borrow that amount of money easily from their friends or relatives. So how effective is that. And if the government increase the cost of the membership fee, who will want to come to Singapore just to gamble? they can go to other countries like malaysia or indonesia which is also very close to Singapore. So, is that $100 membership fee really that effective?
hey i am toney jacob of p09
what i have found is that Religious groups and social workers voiced their disapproval at the negative social impact of gambling.
The Government however, promised to have a proper and strict safeguard to limit the social impact of gambling, among others exorbitant entrance fee and the casinos would not extend credit to local population.
Hi I'm Mark from UIR P08.
I think that despite the government taking such measures, there would still be some people who will find loopholes within these measures and gamble their life away. Like what Mindy said in an earlier post regarding the $100 membership fee to enter the casino; how effective is imposing that membership fee going to be? $100 is a small amount to desperate gamblers who are willing to do anything to gamble.
I'm not implying that everybody would end up this way with the completion of the integrated resort. The IR has it's plus points as well. Gambling is something that people in the masses do, and this would be something that can attract tourists into the country, thus improving the economy greatly. Despite the many objections raised by religious groups and social workers, I think that the IR would be a success. I'm sure the Singapore government would not do anything that would affect the economy and growth of Singapore negatively.
what is UIR?
The first impact on the upcoming integrated resort in Singapore is the marketing efforts towards Singapore’s tourism industry. There will be media, conferences and many other marketing tools that will contribute to the success in making Singapore as a tourism destination worldwide.
This will boost Singapore’s attractiveness as a premium destination for leisure visitors, and will result in a good image for our tourism industry. There will also be more tourist arrivals when the integrated resorts are launched.
Therefore, with more tourists, it would mean more spending. This generates revenue for our tourism industry to further develop and improve.
Our tourism industry has managed pretty well without a casino so far. So, just a few questions that I need your opinions on..
Is it really necessary to make gambling a key part of our tourism strategy?
Will the presence of a casino lead to an increase in law and order problems?
Is this a good gamble for our society? Regarding any negative social impacts on our society, that is.