i say the 1st month sure will see the 'results' ready.Originally posted by Pitot:sorry to tell you. you will see the casinos in person in a few years time.
that is another thing. build the 'fun' things like hotel, amusement park is ok. but the casino is the problem.Originally posted by sand king:I would like to see an F1 track on Sentosa!
sg gahmen earn the $$, but the gamblers will pay for it.Originally posted by 798:but u have to admit the fact dat every casinos make money.
but i hate the excuse from government dat building casino is for the benefit for singapore, so dat singapore can earn a revenue n have many future reserves. but the real fact is building IR is to keep the government's pocket fat!
dat is the root of greeds for all mankinds.Originally posted by popmynutsy:sg gahmen earn the $$, but the gamblers will pay for it.
but building a casino here will allow more people to gamble.Originally posted by :A casino may not necessarily be a soial ill. Even if there's no casino in Sg, Singaporeans can and will still go to countries with casinos to gamble. Might as well we build them and earn revenue from Singaporeans and tourists alike.
Same principle applies to Geylang wad. Having the red light district diesn't neceesarily mean that all men will become sex-crazed ma...........
Singaporeans are already complaining that Sg is so boring. Yet when the govt decides to proceed building the IRs and bring F1 to Singapore, people have so much reservations!
indeed. but the governments have taken these measurements like:Originally posted by popmynutsy:but building a casino here will allow more people to gamble.
even if they ban poor people from going in. the rich people also will kena. sure gamble lost many $$ 1.Originally posted by 798:other measures will be:
- Exclusion system that disallow entry to people with bad financial records (Eg financial distress, or receiving social assistance, voluntary exclusion by friends/family members).
- Ban casino from extending credit limits to locals.
- National framework to address problem gambling.
National Council on Gambling, Institute of Mental Health Community Addictions Management Programme (CAMP), Thye Hua Kwan Moral Society / Care Corner Counselling Centre, Credit Counselling Singapore, etc
their family members can ask the authority to ban if their husband/father is an addicter.Originally posted by popmynutsy:even if they ban poor people from going in. the rich people also will kena. sure gamble lost many $$ 1.
Your point is noted.Originally posted by popmynutsy:even if they ban poor people from going in. the rich people also will kena. sure gamble lost many $$ 1.
singapore will fall.Originally posted by Devil1976:It's not about 'should' or 'should not'... You think they care about what ya say....?
Yesterday in the news, I heard one of the ministers(?) say.. "Don't care about who's earning more $ and who's earning less $ now... We should be more FOCUSED on building Singapore's future... Think about who's leading you now....." (or something like that) I ALMOST LAUGHED MY HEAD OFF....
SAME OLD THING as what they said during the ELECTION... We wanna be more FOCUSED with helping people find their jobs... Which in the end, they just told people it's their own job to upgrade themselves and find job... How convenient?
i also PRAY dat IR will lose money!Originally posted by popmynutsy:when they see the results of the casino, i bet the gahmen sure feel damn sad.
Originally posted by T.Ryousuke:that is the word.
The most jialat one will be the middle income, aunties/ uncle just draw their CPF, and some day dreamer. Once u start there will be no end.