Charles Bradlaugh
Charles Bradlaugh (1833-1891) was the first militant atheist of Western civilization.
He was elected to the British parliament six times, and each time he could not seat there. The reson was because he was an atheist, and therefore would not swear on the allegiance (which included a reference to God). Everyone in England knew Bradlaugh and his fight, thus he raised the issue of atheism to the general public.
Interestingly, a debate that has taken place on 1876, called "Is the Bible divine ?", is still available. This long and heated debate, which included tight questioning sessions for both debaters, has taken place on six consecutive days. The biblical topic discussed were indeed very intricate and complex.
Here is an extract of the first questioning session, with Roberts being the questioner and Bradlaugh answering.
"Q: Mr. Bradlaugh, do you believe that there ever existed such a man as Jesus Christ ?
A: I do not believe that there ever existed such a man as Jesus Christ, with the history recorded of him in the Four Gospels. It is quite possible that a man named Jesus, not having such history, may have existed.
Q: Then, do I understand you to say that the Christ, who is the subject of the Four Gospels and of Paul's letters, is a historical myth ?
A: I say that that which is represented as the history of Jesus in the Four Gospels and the Epistles is not the history of a real man".
Bradlaugh wrote many essays and dialogues, especially between 1860 and 1864. From one of Bradlaugh's essays, "What did Jesus teach ?" (approx. 1860).
"Jesus substitutes "I believe" for "I think," and puts "watch and pray" instead of "think, then act." Belief is the prominent doctrine which pervades and governs all Christianity. It is represented that, at the judgment, the world will be reproved "Of sin, because they believe not." This teaching is most disastrous; man should be incited to active thought: Christian belief would bind him to the teachings of a stagnant past".
In a very scholarly and pertinent essay called "A plea for atheism", Bradlaugh argues for atheism with many arguments that are still raised today against theism, and also discusses the origin of religion. For example, he writes, in regard to the "first cause" argument :
"Another Theistic proposition is thus stated "Every effect must have a cause; the first cause universal must be eternal: ergo, the first cause universal must be God." This is equivalent to saying that "God" is "first cause." But what is to be understood by cause? Defined in the absolute the word has no real value. "Cause," therefore, cannot be eternal. What can be understood by "first cause"? To us the two words convey no meaning greater than would be conveyed by the phrase "round triangle." Cause and effect are correlative terms -- each cause is the effect of some precedent; each effect the cause of its consequent. It is impossible to conceive existence terminated by a primal or initial cause. The "beginning," as it is phrased, of the universe is not thought out by the Theist, but conceded without thought. To adopt the language of Montaigne: "Men make themselves believe that they believe." The so-called belief in Creation is nothing more than the prostration of the intellect on the threshold of the unknown".
He named his daughter Hypatia Bradlaugh, after the Dark Ages philosopher Hypatia of Alexandria, who we have talked about earlier.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Ingersoll
Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899) is the most important historical figure of freethought. Criticizing religion's history and promoting rationalism, his lectures attracted large crowds and were widely published.
His works are large in number and varied in topic. He also took part in many debates on the Christian religion. This is an extract from one of his interviews, which is about the Bible (Ingersoll answers) :
"Q: If I asked for proofs for your theory, what would you furnish ?
A: The experience of every man who is honest with himself, every fact that has been discovered in nature. In addition to these, the utter and total failure of all religionists in all countries to produce one particle of evidence showing the existence of any supernatural power whatever, and the further fact that the people are not satisfied with their religion. They are continually asking for evidence. They are asking it in every imaginable way. The sects are continually dividing. There is no real religious serenity in the world. All religions are opponents of intellectual liberty, I believe in absolute mental freedom. Real religion with me is a thing not of the head, but of the heart; not a theory, not a creed, but a life".
In "Why am I an agnostic ?", Ingersoll explains his feelings towards reason :
"I believe in the religion of reason -- the gospel of this world; in the development of the mind, in the accumulation of intellectual wealth, to the end that man may free himself from superstitious fear, to the end that he may take advantage of theforces of nature to feed and clothe the world.
Let us be honest with ourselves. In the presence of countless mysteries; standing beneath the boundless heaven sown thick with constellations; knowing that each grain of sand, each leaf, each blade of grass, asks of every mind the answerless question; knowing that the simplest thing defies solution; feeling that we deal withthe superficial and the relative, and that we are forever eluded by the real, the absolute, -- let is admit the limitations of our minds, and let us have the courage and the candor to say: We do not know".
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Another important atheist, Abner Kneeland (1774-1844), was the publisher of the atheistic newspaper "Boston Investigator", and has been prosecuted for blasphemy.
Other social movements contained a number of proeminent atheists.
The American suffragette movement had many women atheists in its ranks, as Elizabeth Cady Stanton (1815-1902) who wrote "The Woman's Bible" and Matilda Joslyn Gage (1826-189
, who wrote "Woman, Church and State".
The organisations for sex education and birth control were persecuted also at the time. Charles Knowlton (1800-1850), who wrote "Fruits of Philosophy", a book on birth control, saw his publishers imprisoned for publication of "obscene" material.
At the turn of the century, religions began their "doomsday" phase, preaching apocalypse and the end of the world. This tread is still present today. On the other hand, atheist organisations saw the coming of the millenium with optimism and renewed vigor.
It was a time of ideas and revolutions. Atheist philosophers formed new movements like socialism (Jeremy Bentham,John Stuart Mill, Robert Owen), communism (Marx and Lenin). They revolutionarised psychiatry (Freud, H. Ellis), literature (Mark Twain, George Eliot, Ambroise Bierce, H.G. Wells).
Atheism was now fully established and could stand on its own. After the emergence of humanism during the Renaissance and freethinking in the 19th century, it was now time for atheism to take its place.