BIMAN A310 Aborted T/OFF at DXB .1303
-
Chaotic is an understatement! This is where the airport EACP merge with the airlines own Crisis Handing Procedures as well as their BCP ( business Continuity Plan ).which is why in Singapore ,there is one crash/crisis exercise every year.
Biman nose gear collapsed during an aborted t/off, Hard braking. ( Rare )..ANA Q400 nose gear refused to deploy. The pilots did very well keepin the acft straight n streamlined plus a gradual drop of e nose. It's what known as a controlled "crash."
Reminds me of e quote abt good vs great vs excellent landing.
"
Geez. DBX aiport closed for more than 7+hrs. flights diverted, delayed or transfered. must be pretty chaotic when announcement of closure made.
ANA Q400 had a nose landing too... another landing incident reported in a week?" -
last year a biman A310 also had problems at WSSS. seemed like the brakes caught on fire n frie engines on within a min.. i was working there at the time and it was at least stuck on the taxiway for over 6 hrs.
-
I am curious as to how/why the nosegear collapsed during the heavy braking that followed the rejected take-off. I seem to recall that part of the certification process for an airliner included demonstrating that it was capable of coming safely to a stop after a rejected take-off at V1 with the airliner at maximum take-off weight (MTOW), with maximum wheel braking and no thrust reversers deployed.
(From the pictures, it doesn't look like the nosegear collapse was caused by overrunning the runway.) -
Exactly!! U got my point..tat's is why I said " ( rare)..
mayb he pulled handbrake..oops, parking brake during the RTO & want to do a " tokyo " drift?..
Usually for A310 or most commercial airlines, once u select RTO, u only need firm pressure on brakes( rubber tops ) n the RTO system, anti skid will take over.
Let's see what the report saysOriginally posted by Meia Gisborn:I am curious as to how/why the nosegear collapsed during the heavy braking that followed the rejected take-off. I seem to recall that part of the certification process for an airliner included demonstrating that it was capable of coming safely to a stop after a rejected take-off at V1 with the airliner at maximum take-off weight (MTOW), with maximum wheel braking and no thrust reversers deployed.
(From the pictures, it doesn't look like the nosegear collapse was caused by overrunning the runway.) -
i was going to post the footage here but dennoc beat me to it.
damn that footage is wicked!
i think everyone on site went
thank goodness the runway was 13000ft long...
and i cant imagine the crew onboard the 747..
they must have been peeing in their pants..
holt sh!t pls dont let it come into us..
with that said, full credit to the flight crew of the plane to keep it on the runway.
-
CGZTQWXOY&mode=related&search=" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGZTQWXOY&mode=related&search=
this is a longer version of the ANA clip..
I cant stop laughing even though it is a serious moment! jsut watch it!!
HAI HAI HAI HAI HAI HAI HAI HAI HAI! LMAO -
The url contained a malformed video id.Originally posted by Pitot:CGZTQWXOY&mode=related&search=" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGZTQWXOY&mode=related&search=
this is a longer version of the ANA clip..
I cant stop laughing even though it is a serious moment! jsut watch it!!
HAI HAI HAI HAI HAI HAI HAI HAI HAI! LMAO
