another outing ah!
-
so if you are proving me wrong, how come earlier you said you are not justifying because you felt its a personal attack,and that its your personal opnions, do not need to justifyOriginally posted by R3SsH|n:
contradictory
you are simply shirking your responsiblity
freedom of speech, u demand, but when taken to task, you demand the right to spit at people's home? responsibility gone down the longkang?
it could be 24 years down the road, but why care about how long it is?
focus on the facts not period
so, if you think they are sufficient, why from page two till now never justify?
all u said is personal opinions and personal attacks
this is justification?
-
-
Originally posted by laurence82:clearly u cannot distinguish a statement from a question
or else i put a frigging question mark for what?
this is whinehouse, a forum populated by jc students and others
objective of whinehouse: a place to whine for all people. i did not for one second thing that this is a jc place thats why i place my jc remarks here.
strangely i was always on the later part, about populated by jc forums, now you are on whinehouse alone?
hmm, subforums and all those crap u said just now, isn't whinehouse a place to whine? i think it is; only you think that this is a jc forum
even the earlier quotes i put right on this page or last stated so
why are u insisting on the wording whinehouse now?
for what reasons i condemn u? clearly, u did nto read my first post? i rem clearly
and they have been made into wonderful six pointers from a to f
i answered your six points, if u cannot comprehend, then maybe u ain't cut out for debate from the start
they include why are you making unwarranted stinging remarks in other people place?
i insist this is whinehouse because u are the one who thinks this is a jc forum instead of this being whinehouse...
of course your views are biased
This statement proves you already place a verdict on me and whatever i said will not matter thus i see no point to explain to you my actions
like i said, and you said, its your personal opinion, if you were a statistician, a sociology researcher, your words are more believable
when my lecturer's daughter studied in NUS Sociology course, she could said things like Chinese are gamblers Indians are alcoholics, simply because she had conducted a research
hmm, guess u don't know what is observation
you did not have, and you said you do not want to justify because its your personal opinion
AGAIN i do not want to justify to U because u are bias(refer to line above)
since when personal opinion not backed up by facts is the truth? if its not the truth its biased
waseh, personal opinion must be back up by facts? then what happen to perspective
simple as that -
i didnt say you could not post in whinehseOriginally posted by R3SsH|n:hmm, people attack you then just sit there and wait?
i didn't even scold her when she told me to fcuk off..i replied with a warm post.
yea..but u say i cannot post in whinehouse. this is whinehouse, not a jc forum like you say, why i cannot post?
since when?
i said for the nth time, its a forum where jc students are many aplenty, you deliberately make stinging remarks despite pleas
woohoo, i must have repeated this for 100th time
attack u? i am right to say you could no forgot egoism, also known as self
self leads to pride
if you shake off that feelins people are attacking you, you can focus more on justifying and less on personal assasination -
Originally posted by laurence82:again wrong
i have four lines, and each time u choose to quote only one line
clever arent you?
the four lines are specifically
having biased opinions which you refused to justify
my opinions are only biased because YOU SAID THEY are.
i will only justify my opinions to people i deem worthwhile my effort
making unwarranted stinging remarks
these comments are not directed at anyone in particular and they remain my comments
against people in their forum
hmm, this one is whinehouse, not a jc forum, so you wrong
despite them airing grievances
laurance is making me so sad, so can you fcuk off?
these should be looked at wholly, not simply, like populated by JC students which is roughly the meaning of third line
i always made it a point to post these four lines, not singly
i replied to those 4 lines -
you just admitted, so this post no longer mattersOriginally posted by R3SsH|n:nahz..you got it wrong....AGAIN
my personal agenda in this topic is to shut you up for calling me a troll and thinking that you are always right and want to play justice crusader
instead of focusing on the facts, like i predicted in my second reply ( i believe) you will concentrate on my personality, character, how i play hero, how i structure my postOriginally posted by R3SsH|n:SP, sometimes u have to believe and defend what you believe in. i believe i was wronged being called a troll and i will do whatever it takes to correct that.
you go school la...before late...enjoy the cny.
years of experience really useful in telling me how people will react to debate
sigh -
he has to be taken to task for pursuing his anti jc crap, never mind in chit chat forum, but even until here, till he aggravated, as well as aggravates peopleOriginally posted by lifeisgood9989:hey both of u can u just stop this.. u have been quarelling for one whole night and it's still not enough?? just stop the crap and dun scold each other further.. -
Originally posted by laurence82:so if you are proving me wrong, how come earlier you said you are not justifying because you felt its a personal attack,and that its your personal opnions, do not need to justify
i said i don't need to justify my opionions to someone who cannot have an open mind. evidence of you not having an open mind is personal attacks to me(which includes inferior complexity)
contradictory
i said this alot of times, not contradictory just that u dun undestand
you are simply shirking your responsiblity
freedom of speech, u demand, but when taken to task, you demand the right to spit at people's home? responsibility gone down the longkang?
hmm, how this particular forum is for jc only? you said that lei...i have begun to believe this is whinehouse, not a jc forum
it could be 24 years down the road, but why care about how long it is?
focus on the facts not period
so, if you think they are sufficient, why from page two till now never justify?
all u said is personal opinions and personal attacks
refer to the first point,.
this is justification? -
Originally posted by laurence82:i didnt say you could not post in whinehse
isn't whinehouse your supposedly said jc forum?
since when?
i said for the nth time, its a forum where jc students are many aplenty, you deliberately make stinging remarks despite pleas
i don't make comments about jc students because this place has a lot of jc students.
woohoo, i must have repeated this for 100th time
attack u? i am right to say you could no forgot egoism, also known as self
self leads to pride
if you shake off that feelins people are attacking you, you can focus more on justifying and less on personal assasination
haiz..i have already told you since u made personal attacks to me, i don't see the point of reasoning with you then -
therefore its not for u to pursue your anti jc agendaOriginally posted by R3SsH|n:
fair and square
a forum populated by a large number of jc students, again, for 101 times
you have not answered my six points adequately, and i dont appreciate repetition or cutting off of points, like for example when i issue a four lines describing ur behaviour, i dont appreciate u quoting only one part and attack on it, they are to be looked as a whole
same point again
lets see, i placed that verdict in page what ,10 or 11, not page 2, meaning only after i assessed what you said so far
prove your observations, and prove its not subjective, this i said in second page already
a personal opnion remain biased, until proven, so i am justified and not biased
simple
argue agains this point bah
like i said, if its your own view, dont want to justify, admit and i wont continue giving a damn, but if not, dont bring ur agenda into this forum -
Originally posted by laurence82:
nope, u just don't want to admit you wrong in calling me a troll
you just admitted, so this post no longer matters
instead of focusing on the facts, like i predicted in my second reply ( i believe) you will concentrate on my personality, character, how i play hero, how i structure my post
years of experience really useful in telling me how people will react to debate
sigh
lolx, so from the above statement, you telling me your objective was just a win a debate INSTEAD of "fighting for the rights" of 30,000 jc students
hypocrite la. -
now now, to people u deem worthwhileOriginally posted by R3SsH|n:
means, firstly you try to escape justifications of your actions
secondly, this is ur third reason already, after personal attacks and personal opinions
they remain comments, unproven, unwarranted and hurting others, who made this clear to u
again, the four lines rule apply, dont look at one line only
this is a forum populated by jc students signnificantly and whom some noted and plead that you do not continue ur agenda
personal attacks, sheesh, and resorting to expletives already
steady ur nerves boy -
u have not even started proving, u explicitly said so, whats is there to open to?Originally posted by R3SsH|n:
again, a forum populated by mainly jc students, whom you made stinging remarks, against their pleas
102nd time i think -
therefore its not for u to pursue your anti jc agenda
fair and square
a forum populated by a large number of jc students, again, for 101 times
whatever u quote, i can make my jc remarks anywhere i like
you have not answered my six points adequately, and i dont appreciate repetition or cutting off of points, like for example when i issue a four lines describing ur behaviour, i dont appreciate u quoting only one part and attack on it, they are to be looked as a whole
you don't understand my answers, i can't help it.
same point again
lets see, i placed that verdict in page what ,10 or 11, not page 2, meaning only after i assessed what you said so far
prove your observations, and prove its not subjective, this i said in second page already
a personal opnion remain biased, until proven, so i am justified and not biased
lolx,as if your personal opinon is unbias; hypocrite
simple
argue agains this point bah
like i said, if its your own view, dont want to justify, admit and i wont continue giving a damn, but if not, dont bring ur agenda into this forum
whatever you have in your pouch is used up. you are going round and round, you lose. -
exactly, you are the one who keep saying this is a jc forumOriginally posted by R3SsH|n:
as proven
you just did
first page
denial is ur resort now?
u have not proven which is personal attacks, and why is it relevant
will personal attacks make ur proof any less in value and strength? -
can u quote something worthwhile?Originally posted by laurence82:now now, to people u deem worthwhile
means, firstly you try to escape justifications of your actions
secondly, this is ur third reason already, after personal attacks and personal opinions
they remain comments, unproven, unwarranted and hurting others, who made this clear to u
again, the four lines rule apply, dont look at one line only
this is a forum populated by jc students signnificantly and whom some noted and plead that you do not continue ur agenda
personal attacks, sheesh, and resorting to expletives already
steady ur nerves boy
who knows what you talking to the air? -
Originally posted by R3SsH|n:
i reserve the right to call you a troll, because you made unwarranted stinging remarks in a forum populated by large number of jc students, even you urself ask if poly student will be left out, against pleas
nope, u just don't want to admit you wrong in calling me a troll
[b]
instead of focusing on the facts, like i predicted in my second reply ( i believe) you will concentrate on my personality, character, how i play hero, how i structure my post
years of experience really useful in telling me how people will react to debate
sigh
lolx, so from the above statement, you telling me your objective was just a win a debate INSTEAD of "fighting for the rights" of 30,000 jc students
hypocrite la.[/b]
pls prove that statement means i want to win a debate
prove!
also, i not fighting for the rights of 30k, u couldn prove and dont want to prove, so what else can i do? i am fighting against u trolling this forum
u are welcomed to troll chit chat or set up ur anti jc forum -
good morning guys
-
Originally posted by laurence82:u have not even started proving, u explicitly said so, whats is there to open to?
again, a forum populated by mainly jc students, whom you made stinging remarks, against their pleas
papercut telling me fcuk off is a plea?
hmm, u are being elitist to say since this forum populate by mainly jc students cannot have bad comments about them.
102nd time i think -
Originally posted by R3SsH|n:
wanting freedom of speech, but refuse responsibility by justifying
[b]
therefore its not for u to pursue your anti jc agenda
fair and square
a forum populated by a large number of jc students, again, for 101 times
whatever u quote, i can make my jc remarks anywhere i like
you have not answered my six points adequately, and i dont appreciate repetition or cutting off of points, like for example when i issue a four lines describing ur behaviour, i dont appreciate u quoting only one part and attack on it, they are to be looked as a whole
you don't understand my answers, i can't help it.
same point again
lets see, i placed that verdict in page what ,10 or 11, not page 2, meaning only after i assessed what you said so far
prove your observations, and prove its not subjective, this i said in second page already
a personal opnion remain biased, until proven, so i am justified and not biased
lolx,as if your personal opinon is unbias; hypocrite
simple
argue agains this point bah
like i said, if its your own view, dont want to justify, admit and i wont continue giving a damn, but if not, dont bring ur agenda into this forum
whatever you have in your pouch is used up. you are going round and round, you lose.[/b]
u have not answer the six questions adequately
first you said i refused to accept, now u said i couldnt understand
pls make up ur mind
its not about my opinion
i never fight against ur opinions since u cant prove anyway, its like swatting a fly easily, but all i asking is that u cease and desist trolling this forum -
Originally posted by laurence82:exactly, you are the one who keep saying this is a jc forum
no lei, i think this is whinehouse, you think this is a jc forum
as proven
you just did
quote something, who knows what u talking about?
first page
denial is ur resort now?
quote something again
u have not proven which is personal attacks, and why is it relevant
read up again
will personal attacks make ur proof any less in value and strength?
personal attacks makes my proof unhearable in your view. -
i never said hers is pleaOriginally posted by R3SsH|n:
i said she already know ur history
strangely people who walks in know..sigh
now its another new twist, the elitist judgment
you couldnt and dont even want to prove ur points, and using this to make stinging remarks agains a forum populated by large number of jc students despite them telling before and right now, knowing ur history, not to do so
who says cannot have bad comments? its cannot have unwarranted biased bad comments -
i reserve the right to call you a troll, because you made unwarranted stinging remarks in a forum populated by large number of jc students, even you urself ask if poly student will be left out, against pleas
lol, i deserver to call you a hypocrite because your surface objective was to fight for the 30,000 jc students but in acutal fact, you just want to win a debate
pls prove that statement means i want to win a debate
prove!
you already lost your focus of debate and come up with things like lousy debating skills and going round and round even though i have clearly given u an answer.
also, i not fighting for the rights of 30k, u couldn prove and dont want to prove, so what else can i do? i am fighting against u trolling this forum
lol...i dun need to say much, look at page 1-2
u are welcomed to troll chit chat or set up ur anti jc forum
nahz, i reserve to post anywhere.. -
morning!Originally posted by skid:good morning guys -
With all due respect, gentlemen, if this back and forth counterproductive flaming were to continue, I would have to end this thread as soon as possible.
I'm going off to school soon, and I'll be reaching there at 9am++. By then if I see that neither side is willing to cease and desist, I'll close this thread.