No camera phone got digital camera or not?Originally posted by mystiv:dont gek me. i no cam phone![]()
why u gek me againOriginally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:No camera phone got digital camera or not?
k then. 1 of the more confusing/tougher questionsOriginally posted by the Bear:type out lah..
Ok lor.Originally posted by mystiv:why u gek me again![]()
Originally posted by mystiv:k then. 1 of the more confusing/tougher questions
topic = differentiation
Suppose one molecule of product C is formed from one molecule of reactant A and one molecule of reactant B, and the initial concentrations of A and B have a common value [A] = [B] = a mol/dm^3, then C =
a^2kt
----------
akt + 1
where k is a constant. Find the rate of reaction at time t
why you gek me again, me have $0 nowOriginally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:Ok lor.
Take taxi to coolmyth's house.![]()
erm reaction kinetics?? anyway i think is find dc/dt lor. the differentiation you do by sepearting the term into partial fractions then differentiate.Originally posted by mystiv:k then. 1 of the more confusing/tougher questions
topic = differentiation
Suppose one molecule of product C is formed from one molecule of reactant A and one molecule of reactant B, and the initial concentrations of A and B have a common value [A] = [B] = a mol/dm^3, then C =
a^2kt
----------
akt + 1
where k is a constant. Find the rate of reaction at time t
done thatOriginally posted by the Bear:uhh.. just differentiate... [a^2kt] [akt + 1]^-1
I like leh. Since now no money, walk home.Originally posted by mystiv:why you gek me again, me have $0 now
jokin![]()
differentiated long agoOriginally posted by hisoka:erm reaction kinetics?? anyway i think is find dc/dt lor. the differentiation you do by sepearting the term into partial fractions then differentiate.
thats the answer mah i suppose cos the rate of reaction of a and b should theoritcally be the same. but then whats the way of calculationg the reaction kinetics? you studying reaction kinetics should know bah....Originally posted by mystiv:done that
like that only meh? cannot be mah..
Originally posted by mystiv:done that
like that only meh? cannot be mah..
I think so.Originally posted by mystiv:done that
like that only meh? cannot be mah..
i at home leh. where you want me walk to?Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:I like leh. Since now no money, walk home.![]()
Walk to the rooftop of your house.Originally posted by mystiv:i at home leh. where you want me walk to?
ooh. u mean your home?![]()
![]()
![]()
i know how to differentiateOriginally posted by the Bear:dunno what it's called...
d/dt [vu] = u dv/dt + v du/dt
or something like that? i forgot..
that's it i would think.. that'll be the rate of reaction...
Product rule can be used for fractions meh?Originally posted by the Bear:dunno what it's called...
d/dt [vu] = u dv/dt + v du/dt
or something like that? i forgot..
that's it i would think.. that'll be the rate of reaction...
you jump i jump?Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:Walk to the rooftop of your house.![]()
Originally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:Product rule can be used for fractions meh?
I thought is the other one?
(v du/dt - u dv/dt)/v^2
product rule can. just slightly longer routeOriginally posted by ndmmxiaomayi:Product rule can be used for fractions meh?
I thought is the other one?
(v du/dt - u dv/dt)/v^2
I think need lah.Originally posted by mystiv:i know how to differentiate
what i meant was, no need to find numerical value meh?
Originally posted by mystiv:product rule can. just slightly longer route
just to restate, i have no problems with differentiating![]()
You jump, I take lift.Originally posted by mystiv:you jump i jump?![]()