No $$ No cameraOriginally posted by sgboy2004:no $$ no gain
Originally posted by deathscythe99:What is your budget? What do you want to take? Going to take seriously? or just take snap shots?
Yupz...I like photography, but the price is really a [b]big big factor...
Thinking of splurging on a prosumer, maybe a FZ-10 ($710 w/ 3rd party battery, Payee Adapter 62mm thread, 62mm Lense hood and cap, Hoya UV Filter, Vitacon Circular Polarizer) or FZ-20 ($858 w/ 256mb Card and Case).
To u photography experts out there, which is a better choice? Hopefully, u guys can give me some advice. Currently I'm using a FX-5, so since I've some SD cards already it would be pretty easy to switch around.[/b]
Will be intending to play around more, that's why gg for a prosumer instead of the DSLRs found in the market (350D, 300D, D70)Originally posted by spencer99:What is your budget? What do you want to take? Going to take seriously? or just take snap shots?
like what joho says most of the time, most of the time its not the equipment, its the person behind the lensOriginally posted by FireIce:i like taking pix (not of myself)
but i paiseh to go fotography outing
im using an ao piao digicam![]()
"gong yu shan qi shi, bi xian li qi qi"Originally posted by kopiosatu:like what joho says most of the time, most of the time its not the equipment, its the person behind the lens
but ah, because of the shoots i've been covering lately, i really need good lens.
time to buy a better cam liao lohhhhh~Originally posted by FireIce:"gong yu shan qi shi, bi xian li qi qi"
to do work well, u need good equipment.
im not complaining......the digicam has been with me for so many yrs, im used to it oredi........know all the functions well.....those new and powerful digicams i fan er dunno how to play.......
somemore i take "abstract" pix.......hahahaha....
no moneyOriginally posted by kopiosatu:time to buy a better cam liao lohhhhh~
u can try looking at someone innocently![]()
But u need a good camera to start with so that you can display the full potential of the person behind the lens tooOriginally posted by kopiosatu:like what joho says most of the time, most of the time its not the equipment, its the person behind the lens
but ah, because of the shoots i've been covering lately, i really need good lens.
Hi hi!Originally posted by LazerLordz:Hello !!![]()
well i think that when you start to realise that your camera can't give you pictures you want, then you get a new camera. its better than getting a good camera, don't feel the squeeze, then blame the camera.Originally posted by deathscythe99:But u need a good camera to start with so that you can display the full potential of the person behind the lens too
I dun have the zoom which I need now, and I aint able to get wide angle stuff...Now what I have is a consumer PnS, so, I guess that's reason enough?Originally posted by kopiosatu:well i think that when you start to realise that your camera can't give you pictures you want, then you get a new camera. its better than getting a good camera, don't feel the squeeze, then blame the camera.
Wont fetch much money.Originally posted by LazerLordz:Sell your PnS first?
Originally posted by deathscythe99:fz10
Yupz...I like photography, but the price is really a [b]big big factor...
Thinking of splurging on a prosumer, maybe a FZ-10 ($710 w/ 3rd party battery, Payee Adapter 62mm thread, 62mm Lense hood and cap, Hoya UV Filter, Vitacon Circular Polarizer) or FZ-20 ($858 w/ 256mb Card and Case).
To u photography experts out there, which is a better choice? Hopefully, u guys can give me some advice. Currently I'm using a FX-5, so since I've some SD cards already it would be pretty easy to switch around.[/b]
Price-wise?Originally posted by bismarck:fz10
less noisy
same sensor size. less pixels=less crowded..
cheaper bah..Originally posted by deathscythe99:Price-wise?
Nah....ppl still sell @ 650 for the camera lorOriginally posted by bismarck:cheaper bah..
since it;s older.