Tuesday, June 16, 2009
Why aren't birds larger?
Fifteen-kilogram swans hold the current upper size record for flying birds,
although the extinct Argentavis of the Miocene Epoch in Argentina is estimated
to have weighed 70 kilograms, the size of an average human. In a forthcoming
article in PLoS Biology, Sievert Rohwer, and his colleagues at the Burke Museum
at the University of Washington, provide evidence that maximum body size in
birds is constrained by the amount of time it takes to replace the flight
feathers during molt. As bird size increases, feather growth rate fails to keep
up with feather length until, eventually; feathers wear out before they can be
replaced. This fundamental relationship requires basic changes in the molt
strategy as size increases, ultimately limiting the size of flying birds.
Feathers deteriorate with continued exposure to ultra-violet light and
bacterial decomposition, and must be replaced periodically to maintain adequate
aerodynamic support for flight. Small birds accomplish this in an annual or
twice-annual molt, during which the 9 or 10 primary flight feathers are replaced
sequentially, taking about three weeks for each feather. Large species of birds
need different approaches to feather replacement. These involve several
alternative strategies: prolonging the total molt to two or even three years;
simultaneously replacing multiple feathers from different molt-origination
points in the feather sequence; and, in species that do not require flight to
feed or escape enemies (ducks and geese, for example), replacing all feathers
simultaneously.
With increasing body size, the length of the primary
feathers increases as the one-third power of mass, approximately doubling with
each 10-fold increase in mass. However, the rate of feather growth increases
only as the one-sixth power of mass, meaning that the time required to replace
each feather increases by a factor of about 1.5 for each 10-fold increase in
mass, until 56 days are required to replace a single flight feather in a 10-kg
bird. The cause of this discrepancy is not known, but the authors speculate that
it probably depends on the geometry of producing a two-dimensional feather
structure from a one-dimensional growing zone in the feather shaft.
The
avian feather is one of the most striking adaptations in the animal world, and
yet its growth dynamics are poorly understood. It might be possible to achieve
more rapid feather growth with a larger growth zone, but this could also weaken
the structure of the growing feather, resulting in frequent breakage in large
birds. Understanding the engineering complexities of the growing feather will
require further study of the dynamics and structure of the growing zone. And
what about Argentavis? The authors speculate that this giant bird most likely
molted all its feathers simultaneously during a long fast, fueled by accumulated
fat deposits much in the same way as emperor penguins do today.
###
Public Library of Science
One reason why we don't fly, too heavy.
Yea.... we lack the mechanism.
most animals cannot get larger than a certain size due to pros n cons, for instance in the feline family wild cats started to acquire their small size with their ability to hunt for smaller food.
Originally posted by Bangulzai:most animals cannot get larger than a certain size due to pros n cons, for instance in the feline family wild cats started to acquire their small size with their ability to hunt for smaller food.
Is that why those eating beef are bigger size than those eating chicken?
Originally posted by Chew Bakar:Is that why those eating beef are bigger size than those eating chicken?
I eat beef but my size isn't as big as you think...