In the case of MJK issue, he is proposing Di Zi Gui as ENTRY AND FOUNDATION TO BUDDHISM. That is a great difference.
as we explained over and over, this is æ–ç« å�–义, there are more to it. pls re-listen to the mp3 posted earlier.
No. 234a.
ftp://new.pllc.cn/media/64K/02/039/
ftp://new.pllc.cn/media/64K/02/039/02-039-0234a.mp3
which i think can clarified the air. the quote say the Fundamental of Buddhism is �善业��; Daoism is 《太上感应篇》; Confucius is then Di Zi Gui.
Originally posted by Amitayus48:Why not let go of this quagmire understanding and read another perspective from an enlightened Chan master and Buddha Sakyamuni himself on the founders of Confucius and Daoism -
《万善å�Œå½’集》-永明延寿禅师开示：è€�å�å”å�是何圣？如何看待儒é�“？
《起世界�》云：
佛言：我é�£äºŒåœ£ï¼Œå¾€éœ‡æ—¦è¡ŒåŒ–。一者，è€�å�，是迦å�¶è�©è�¨ã€‚二者，å”å�，是儒童è�©è�¨ã€‚(having intent of Di Zi Gui as waidao is not very fair to è€�å�å”å� who were 迦å�¶è�©è�¨ and å„’ç«¥è�©è�¨ )
nice one. now who's the "wai dao"?. Buddha also? cannot be, right? so according to 《起世界�》, the messager is waidao.
ps: sorry guys, think we call it off, no point , as nothing is getting through. anything else can pm me.
/\