SQ A340-500 Screenshots
-
Cairo -> Athens Airbus A340-500
Note that this route does not exist for SQ, i flew it for fun.
ILS Approach
On Approach
At 750ft
Flare
Spoilers up, Reverse thrust
Parking Lot
Time to knock off.
Comments please?
Plane used- CLS A345 (payware) -
Did the payware do u any justice? Btw nice shots.. maybe u could try some in mid air next time round. Btw whats ur flight origin n destination?
-
Ok just noticed ur info on top. I was wondering if u flew sin - ewr non-stop.
-
Well I tried using the waypoints (same as the real fl pln) and did a pretty slow step climb (all A340s have a pain in a A$$ climb rate) cruising at 0.74 but i ran out of fuel and had to divert to toronto just like everybody else.Originally posted by Pitot:Ok just noticed ur info on top. I was wondering if u flew sin - ewr non-stop. Its a pity that you can't fly polar routes in FS2004.
After a check online with fellow simmers, i discovered that the product makers had missed out this fuel bug. So i just edited the aircraft.cfg file and now fuel flow seems more reasonable.
My graphic card definately didn't do justice to the A345.
The flight dynamics and controls for this aircraft is excellent, has a heavy feel when taxiing on the ground unlike certain freeware.
The ILS and autoland feature has been re-edited by CLS and the aircraft now lands more gently, compared to the default autoland, where I would rather take the plane down manually.
Overall an excellent and value for money payware, of course the top payware would have to be PMDG B747 queen of the skies. -
Nice shots , that is why SQ is mulling for the 772LR to replace the A345s. I hope that happens. Their new order will take any place any time now.
-
Poor A345s, they've only been in service for less than 2 yrs? SQ has never been fond of Airbuses. Lets see when the A380 arrives, i really dislike the A380 for its fat aunty look.Originally posted by K800i:Nice shots , that is why SQ is mulling for the 772LR to replace the A345s. I hope that happens. Their new order will take any place any time now.
Then again 777s have one of the best climb rates, ZOOM! Their freakin engines are so big and powerful
-
I flown on SGA and SGC , fantastic interior. The A345 is more powerful then her sister, A343. When I flew her to BKK, her 4 Roll Royce Trent engines rocket to the skies, her power was amazing for short flights. As for the US flights , it's not surprising that her climb rate is slower because of the heavy load. Pros and Cons about the A345. I enjoyed the experience.Originally posted by Don©:Poor A345s, they've only been in service for less than 2 yrs? SQ has never been fond of Airbuses. Lets see when the A380 arrives, i really dislike the A380 for its fat aunty look.
Then again 777s have one of the best climb rates, ZOOM! Their freakin engines are so big and powerful
The aircraft with the best climb rate I feel is the MD-11. Flew on Finnair's MD-11, LGD . Take off was impressive, push you to the seat during take off ! My favourite so far in terms of best climber. -
Impressive, i've never flown on MD-11s before. Mostly 777s, 737s, A343 and 747s.Originally posted by K800i:I flown on SGA and SGC , fantastic interior. The A345 is more powerful then her sister, A343. When I flew her to BKK, her 4 Roll Royce Trent engines rocket to the skies, her power was amazing for short flights. As for the US flights , it's not surprising that her climb rate is slower because of the heavy load. Pros and Cons about the A345. I enjoyed the experience.
The aircraft with the best climb rate I feel is the MD-11. Flew on Finnair's MD-11, LGD . Take off was impressive, push you to the seat during take off ! My favourite so far in terms of best climber.
Might get to fly on one someday. -
Just can't blame those hairdryers.
I think it is almost certain that the 777LR will come in. Oh and in other news, SQ just delayed their purchase decision. Yet again. -
Actually talking abt climb rate.. too me, nothing beats the 757 rocketships.. pity, they will be as rare as the MD's soon..
-
Yea, the 757s and 767 are not selling as well as the 777. So i guess they'll be phrased out of the production line soon?Originally posted by Pitot:Actually talking abt climb rate.. too me, nothing beats the 757 rocketships.. pity, they will be as rare as the MD's soon.. -
The last 757 have already be made. production line closed.Originally posted by Don©:Yea, the 757s and 767 are not selling as well as the 777. So i guess they'll be phrased out of the production line soon?
Lets hope that the USAF can inject some life into the 767 line if they decide to take the tanker option. If not, i think it will be gone too. soon. -
767 i feel its pretty small for a tanker, maybe for early airborne warning?Originally posted by Pitot:The last 757 have already be made. production line closed.
Lets hope that the USAF can inject some life into the 767 line if they decide to take the tanker option. If not, i think it will be gone too. soon.
I think the survivor award would go to the 747, i mean theres even the 747-800. -
Originally posted by Don©:767 i feel its pretty small for a tanker, maybe for early airborne warning?
I think the survivor award would go to the 747, i mean theres even the 747-800.
The 767 AWACS is reality liao. Japan is one country which uses it.
the tanker is still a plan lo..
-
wad sim game is tis?
-
Microsoft Flight Simulator.Originally posted by mhcampboy:wad sim game is tis? -
Ok icOriginally posted by Pitot:
The 767 AWACS is reality liao. Japan is one country which uses it.
the tanker is still a plan lo..
Thanks for the info. -
But the plane doesn't come with it, its an add-onOriginally posted by mhcampboy:wad sim game is tis?