tat means the gal would be called a s l u t and the male would be called a he s l u tOriginally posted by Marmalade Boy:Lets say that if the person is not attached or married but is going out with a person who is attached and married... what does this considered as?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
wrong, i would.Originally posted by jOhO:i can't imagine anyone saying
"yes i will be unfaithful"...
not becos they are scared of being flamed or chided, but becos the normal moral mature human does not get into a proper reln (not fling) thinking that they will, or want to stray. correct me if i'm wrong, i still do have a little faith in today's people.
i think a more appropriate question is HAVE u, instead of WOULD u?
and if u have, why did u do it?
i know wat u're talking about... i've been all over the place, the third party, the first party, liking someone else's woman, someone else's woman likes me (haven't had someone else's man like me but hey!)Originally posted by keisha:wrong, i would.
and if i start this topic, of cos i'm ready to openly admit tat i will do such a thing, be it i'm the one who stray, or the one who is involve with someone who strays.
why? there's no why. sometimes its plainly cos u don't have enough will power to just make urself walk away. if there is anyone here who had been through this before, then u'll noe how tat feels like. if not, you'll only label ppl like tat a s l u t, or b i t c h. i used to get all agitated when i see stories like tat, would feel like slapping the seducer. but if u have ever been in the same situation, then u'll noe it doesn't feel good, and it ain't easy to get out of it. n it ain't easy not to get involve in the first place.
true ! it's not easy 'cos he also won't let go. ok..we are wrong, ppl hated us, and they called me a seducer or whatever. it happened naturally... and call me a s | u t or wadever .. i still dun regret our r/s.Originally posted by keisha:wrong, i would.
and if i started this topic, of cos i'm ready to openly admit tat i will do such a thing, be it i'm the one who stray, or the one who is involve with someone who strays. but of cos, i definately dun choose to do it, or enjoy doing it.
why? there's no why. its plainly cos u don't have enough will power to just make urself walk away. if there is anyone here who had been through this before, then u'll noe how tat feels like. if not, you'll only label ppl like tat a s l u t, or b i t c h. i used to get all agitated when i see people like tat, would feel like slapping the seducer. but if u have ever been in the same situation, then u'll noe it doesn't feel good, and it ain't easy to get out of it. n it ain't easy not to get involve in the first place.
i tink u r more of correcting the way i phrase my question rite? its have u, rather than would u. ok lah, u r rite lah, it should be 'have u' and not 'would u'Originally posted by jOhO:i know wat u're talking about... i've been all over the place, the third party, the first party, liking someone else's woman, someone else's woman likes me (haven't had someone else's man like me but hey!)
but my point is not that at all..
my point is would u get in to a serious relationship thinking that you WILL stray? why would anyone put in feelings and effort into a reln when they tell themselves that they'll probably hop onto another ship?
the only pple that would do these are players. that said, players do not put in much effort or feelings into their relns.
hahahaOriginally posted by keisha:i tink u r more of correcting the way i phrase my question rite? its have u, rather than would u. ok lah, u r rite lah, it should be 'have u' and not 'would u'![]()
if its in the bedroom, then dun tink i need any 'correction'Originally posted by jOhO:hahaha
no lar! i really thot u meant WOULD u... okook it's HAVE u then....
aiyoh i'm not always on a rampage to correct pple one lar..
unless it's in the bedroom.![]()
![]()
arr u have a point there...Originally posted by keisha:if its in the bedroom, then dun tink i need any 'correction'![]()