Originally posted by Gus.chong:I understood this after all because I was involved in similar cases in the past, but oh well...I was actually quite puzzled about something here...
The clones created this thread and utilised the information from ADAMS' Facebook page, and this case is rather quite similar to the Mercedes-Benz DD case (bodywork done by same company),
I should say that these Volvo B9TL Gemilang photos should be made secret as well, but ADAMS did not receive any notifications from Gemilang to remove all photos and comments related to these matters...
unless the information of the Volvo B9TL Gemilang has been approved to be open information, or it will definitely be very suspicious.
BIS also first to reveal new livery and other kiddos immediate follow BIS publish their own pictures~ again proven BIS must got permission and know when publish new livery pictures~ otherwise kiddos cannot publish their pictures~ BIS only post legal and official pictures~
Jialat sial u all,here in HK bus fans taking bus photos police also dun care..At least most of them got bike or cars so roughly they know whats road hazards
Originally posted by carbikebus:Jialat sial u all,here in HK bus fans taking bus photos police also dun care..At least most of them got bike or cars so roughly they know whats road hazards
Coz the interest of "bus-fanning" is crazy in HK... Police even volunteered to keep fans in order when the last "hotdog" trip was held...
I tell you, honestly when I talk with my HK bus forum mates and then come back to SGF and see all these STOMP ah, Eat Your Words ah all these shit I really wanna laugh man, it's a matter of maturity too
Originally posted by SMB388S:
Info published also on BIS so must be legal and official info~ BIS is most popular and trusted mainstream page on Singapore buses so everything BIS must be legal unlike kiddos~BIS also first to reveal new livery and other kiddos immediate follow BIS publish their own pictures~ again proven BIS must got permission and know when publish new livery pictures~ otherwise kiddos cannot publish their pictures~ BIS only post legal and official pictures~
But BIS post first info~
I thought u say first info confirmed illegal/leaked info~
========
>>>Subscribe to my YouTube channel>>>
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_rkOvXZxJj3IZi1eZLwBgA
Subscribe to me and I will subscribe to you back!
Please visit my channel daily/weekly.
Originally posted by SMB388S:
~~~~~~
Don't keeep using this symbol.
saw this bus is parked at bbdep, facing the PIE ...
Might be a replacement for 9889U which went over brbp
SBS9999 or SBS7777L bah :o
Originally posted by TIB429E:SBS9999 or SBS7777L bah :o
It's confirmed to be SBS7777Y...
Originally posted by SMB388S:
Info published also on BIS so must be legal and official info~ BIS is most popular and trusted mainstream page on Singapore buses so everything BIS must be legal unlike kiddos~BIS also first to reveal new livery and other kiddos immediate follow BIS publish their own pictures~ again proven BIS must got permission and know when publish new livery pictures~ otherwise kiddos cannot publish their pictures~ BIS only post legal and official pictures~
Umm, I should think that the others also took photos at the site (WLBP), as they gathered as a group over there although I'm not sure who got the information on the livery. Anyway, Kean Cham on facebook uploaded a photo of the SMRT DD, yet it still exists, unlike ADAM's photos. Is his photo (Kean Cham's) really illegal? If it is, then why is it still on his page and not removed?
Or SBS1888A?
Originally posted by 23ispolo:Umm, I should think that the others also took photos at the site (WLBP), as they gathered as a group over there although I'm not sure who got the information on the livery. Anyway, Kean Cham on facebook uploaded a photo of the SMRT DD, yet it still exists, unlike ADAM's photos. Is his photo (Kean Cham's) really illegal? If it is, then why is it still on his page and not removed?
Not again...I should have realised it earlier when I began to notice inappropriate actions taken one day ago!
Registered with rego SBS7777Y on the number plate?
...
Originally posted by SBS7777Y:
I know about the WLBP thing... Wonder if the group (including BIS and PTH) actually got permission from SMRT to take those photos?
Yep, that's why I dun know if officially is 7777 a not
Heard that 7777 to BBDEP...
Skali on Service 7. hahahahaha
Don't open mouth close mouth say it's BIS
source is from this person call roger https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=608950479153346&set=a.233291180052613.57716.100001151971928&type=1
Originally posted by 23ispolo:Umm, I should think that the others also took photos at the site (WLBP), as they gathered as a group over there although I'm not sure who got the information on the livery. Anyway, Kean Cham on facebook uploaded a photo of the SMRT DD, yet it still exists, unlike ADAM's photos. Is his photo (Kean Cham's) really illegal? If it is, then why is it still on his page and not removed?
Hi, this is Kean Cham, I would like to clarify with you that the photo was taken legally outside of ST Kinetics. Do you have any problem with the photographer taking photos along the roads?
Thank you!
~Cheers! ^.^
Originally posted by SMB232H:Hi, this is Kean Cham, I would like to clarify with you that the photo was taken legally outside of ST Kinetics. Do you have any problem with the photographer taking photos along the roads?
Thank you!
~Cheers! ^.^
If I am not wrong, you ought to have an old account here previously.
Nice Rego.The bus is at BBDEP,so how you managed to get inside the depot?
Potential candidates:7,10,147 & 196