Redeployments (Part 17)
-
Haiyo at least the public buses here serve more than 12 years before being scrap or sold.Japan public buses had to go off before 8 years old.
-
Is TIB1002X still in AMDEP? Saw it doing 859 today 19/02/2013 at 6.49am.
-
Edited and removed
-
Originally posted by Gus.chong:
Is TIB1002X still in AMDEP? Saw it doing 859 today 19/02/2013 at 6.49am.
There is a 859/980 crossover which is done by AMDEP 980's s-shift.
-
SMB3029J
(AMDEP 169) -
Originally posted by SBS8676Z:
There is a 859/980 crossover which is done by AMDEP 980's s-shift.
Oh.
-
SMB3007Y
[WL 966
WL 965].SMB3032Z
[WL NEW WL 966]. -
I dun think 774H perm 190 in the 1st place TIB774H (KJ 190 > KJ SP)
-
SBS 9406E (SL SP) perm (SL 179)
*I am quite sure that it didnt left svc 179.. However, I think SBS 9223R is a SP bus.
-
Deleted
-
Originally posted by Lsk138:
SBS 8622D (HG 109) TO (HG 159)
spotted cut out 159 svc guide stix on top of the rego plate inside the bus ! same to 6125k also
Yeah. 6125K had marker marking too. Both were confirmed some one month ago.
-
Originally posted by SMB128B:
Heheh. This shows how SMRT fucking mistreats 965. I really don't know what the fuck SMRT is thinking, giving this intentional redeployment to 965, instead of just sending 3032Z directly to 965. Now thinking back, I don't even remember AMY TIME that 965 didn't receive hand-me-down MANs from SMRT.
What is it you want from 965 joker?
I don't call that a mis-treat if you ask me. I find the fleetings ok. I can't even find fault with the current fleets if you ask me. They are doing just fine.
You want new buses? You wait. Simple as that. I'm sick of you bitching about 965 being mis-treated.
-
Originally posted by TIB783G:
What is it you want from 965 joker?
I don't call that a mis-treat if you ask me. I find the fleetings ok. I can't even find fault with the current fleets if you ask me. They are doing just fine.
You want new buses? You wait. Simple as that. I'm sick of you bitching about 965 being mis-treated.
Hahaha nice one there.
His post really gave me the impression as if that SMB3007Y is as suddenly miserably old as a UD..
-
If it is those old nissan jokers i don't mind but hispano O4s?
-
Originally posted by TIB783G:
What is it you want from 965 joker?
I don't call that a mis-treat if you ask me. I find the fleetings ok. I can't even find fault with the current fleets if you ask me. They are doing just fine.
You want new buses? You wait. Simple as that. I'm sick of you bitching about 965 being mis-treated.
If you followed his posts lately, you'll realise he's not just bitching about Sv 965 being apparently "mis-treated" lah. His history includes Sv 163, 70 and some others. It just so happens he's picking on an SMRT service this time.
So I say dude, just don't take it too seriously his words. Chill. He expects the buses to stay like 0 years in age forever.
-
Sv 59
SBS 9210 C (MIA) - SBS 9177 R (59)
-
Edited and removed
-
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:
If you followed his posts lately, you'll realise he's not just bitching about Sv 965 being apparently "mis-treated" lah. His history includes Sv 163, 70 and some others. It just so happens he's picking on an SMRT service this time.
So I say dude, just don't take it too seriously his words. Chill. He expects the buses to stay like 0 years in age forever.
I just don't like it when he keeps whining about 965 buses, which is acceptable for me.
If you still see SBS20T-SBS29U on the streets, I can understand the complaints but would you complain about an O4?
-
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:
If you followed his posts lately, you'll realise he's not just bitching about Sv 965 being apparently "mis-treated" lah. His history includes Sv 163, 70 and some others. It just so happens he's picking on an SMRT service this time.
So I say dude, just don't take it too seriously his words. Chill. He expects the buses to stay like 0 years in age forever.
I did NOT complain about 70. Just to clear.
-
180 having a fleet added. Duty TBC. Should be AM-PM shift
-
----------- Double post ---------
-
SBS8538P
(AMDEP SP) (AMDEP 53)New 'Sv 53' perm stix at EDS controller area in BC cabin. AMDEP finally updated the perm stix on this bus after it went to Sv 53 from Sv 410 since 4 months ago.
This bus is a fleet add, due to change of parent service for the x-over slot between Sv 53 & 410. The Sv 410/53 x-over (parent service then Sv 410) no longer exists, now the x-over that exists is Sv 53/410 (parent service is now Sv 53). Bus that does the Sv 53/410 slot now is one of the Sv 53 Citaros, 5060U goes back to doing Sv 410 only without x-over to Sv 53 during Peak.Many thanks to 'service_238' & 'lemon1974' for helping me with verifying the timings & providing info to me in the process. Cheers.
SBS6358E
(AMDEP 53)This bus should be the BSEP bus for Sv 53. 2nd day stuck on the BSEP slot. And yeah, unless there's any changes, AMDEP has a tendency to deploy new BSEP bus straight onto the service with new BSEP duty. 6314G is still SP for now.
-
Originally posted by ears:
Sv 59
SBS 9210 C (MIA) - SBS 9177 R (59)
Uh, 9177R is on another bus' timings for Sv 59 all this while. Not 9210C's. Before 9210C met with the accident, both were on Sv 59 together and 9177R continued to do the same timings till this week.
-
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:
Uh, 9177R is on another bus' timings for Sv 59 all this while. Not 9210C's. Before 9210C met with the accident, both were on Sv 59 together and 9177R continued to do the same timings till this week.
I think that 9177 is on the former 9181's slot. For the current 9210 should be some random bus.
-
3034 - 963 [WL NEW]