Guess the next WAB service(s) thread
-
can buy Citaro Ks for 42 and then can make 42 WAB!!!
-
Originally posted by Boeing 787 L0VUR:
can buy Citaro Ks for 42 and then can make 42 WAB!!!
can buy Scania KUBs for 42 and then can make 42 WAB!!!
-
service 88,116
-
169?
hmm why is there
"this bus stop is not accessible for PIWs"
on bus stop served by JIS (e.g. 252)
-
969 if the high capacity buses come in early
-
Originally posted by SMB145B:
169?
hmm why is there
"this bus stop is not accessible for PIWs"
on bus stop served by JIS (e.g. 252)
whether the service is non WAB or WABthat thing is there
-
911, 961, 965 for now.
-
Originally posted by SMB189A:
911, 961, 965 for now.
965 nope. 0 WAB perms excluding 270Y wich is perm 960
-
Originally posted by TIB 585L:
965 nope. 0 WAB perms excluding 270Y wich is perm 960
965 can be done easily given the number of new MAN A22s in WLDEP, provided WLDEP is willing to deploy full fleet MANs.
-
Likelikood candidates for March 2013 wave: 50, 62, 88, 112, 116, 119, 132, 159, 222, 262.
And it looks like Toa Payoh interchange is going thru WAB modifications for the end-on berths now.
-
Not 969 please...
-
Originally posted by SBS8676Z:
965 can be done easily given the number of new MAN A22s in WLDEP, provided WLDEP is willing to deploy full fleet MANs.
Haha this is impossible. Look at how SMRT abuse 965's fleet. NEW MANS MAH FOOT. They don't even bother to send the new BSEP MAN for 965's BSEP fleet add. All 965 ever received all these while are hand-me-downs, so I won't be real pleased anyway.
I can even predict perhaps 3007 will soon be replaced by a O405 to serve as BSEP fleet add haha.
-
88 & 50
Infrastructure completed for 88 and if 50 gets WAB, svc 50 - 59 all wab
-
Dunno why you are always complaining about not having new buses. Same with all the ruckus with 163.
You dont want the "hand-me-downs" can always give me. I always appreciate good frequency and seats above "new buses".
-
Originally posted by SBS8676Z:
Likelikood candidates for March 2013 wave: 50, 62, 88, 112, 116, 119, 132, 159, 222, 262.
And it looks like Toa Payoh interchange is going thru WAB modifications for the end-on berths now.
262 Bishan Park is not wheelchair friendly
132 kick in more wrights
-
Originally posted by SMB128B:
Haha this is impossible. Look at how SMRT abuse 965's fleet. NEW MANS MAH FOOT. They don't even bother to send the new BSEP MAN for 965's BSEP fleet add. All 965 ever received all these while are hand-me-downs, so I won't be real pleased anyway.
I can even predict perhaps 3007 will soon be replaced by a O405 to serve as BSEP fleet add haha.
I cannot tolerate it.
You've been whining about 965, 163 and other services ever since I joined this forum. You say it almost in every thread alot of times, people will get sien and ignore you. Say it once and that's it. DON'T KEEP REPEATING IT!
If your job here is to whine about 965, 163 and other ''neglected'' services of yours, then I suggest you don't stay here.
And if you think you want to deploy any buses you want, go to SMRT and tell them what buses to deploy, this service serve where better or whatever shit you want to do.
-
Originally posted by SBS 6078 M:
I cannot tolerate it.
You've been whining about 965, 163 and other services ever since I joined this forum. You say it almost in every thread alot of times, people will get sien and ignore you. Say it once and that's it. DON'T KEEP REPEATING IT!
If your job here is to whine about 965, 163 and other ''neglected'' services of yours, then I suggest you don't stay here.
And if you think you want to deploy any buses you want, go to SMRT and tell them what buses to deploy, this service serve where better or whatever shit you want to do.
He seems to have forgotten about his promise back in December 2011 about his complaints.
-
Originally posted by SMB128B:
Haha this is impossible. Look at how SMRT abuse 965's fleet. NEW MANS MAH FOOT. They don't even bother to send the new BSEP MAN for 965's BSEP fleet add. All 965 ever received all these while are hand-me-downs, so I won't be real pleased anyway.
I can even predict perhaps 3007 will soon be replaced by a O405 to serve as BSEP fleet add haha.
Passengers never even complain, you complain. Boh liao max please~
I wonder what would happen if they dump more lousy bus to 965, perhaps you will just jump off a building to end your life just because of a meaningless issue
-
Originally posted by Gus.chong:
He seems to have forgotten about his promise back in December 2011 about his complaints.
I saw it. Started researching about this site around late Nov 2011, before I create account on 3 Jan 2012.
And now, instead, he flames people for this and that
-
I heard from a senior that...
When a certain bus gets new WAB buses, they have to dump the old non-WABs somewhere else, like how they dumped the VOs on 23, 65, 74, 132, 153, all JIS services etc. instead of making them SP buses.
965's case is because SMRT chooses to dump the O4s on 965.
163's downgrade earlier on was due to HGDEP still having lots of MK3s at that time, and had to deploy them on certain services.
70's case is due to not enough SP WDDs at AMDEP, as mentioned by SBS 9631X. Don't think ADD to WSD replacement is good, as it is a high demand CBD service.
-
If they feel the demand there they will raise the quota.
Just like last year 1st Quarter how they increased 171's WAB quota slowly.
-
And last year how they increase 166's wab quota. And how I find all those fucking perm DM3500s and Wrights
-
Originally posted by TIB783G:
If they feel the demand there they will raise the quota.
Just like last year 1st Quarter how they increased 171's WAB quota slowly.
171's case was mainly due to WLDEP side which did not have any new OC500LE intake back in 2009. It was only when MAN A22s rolled into the fleet which benefitted the WAB quota for 171 later on.
-
Originally posted by TIB 501 D:
I heard from a senior that...
When a certain bus gets new WAB buses, they have to dump the old non-WABs somewhere else, like how they dumped the VOs on 23, 65, 74, 132, 153, all JIS services etc. instead of making them SP buses.
965's case is because SMRT chooses to dump the O4s on 965.
163's downgrade earlier on was due to HGDEP still having lots of MK3s at that time, and had to deploy them on certain services.
70's case is due to not enough SP WDDs at AMDEP, as mentioned by SBS 9631X. Don't think ADD to WSD replacement is good, as it is a high demand CBD service.
132 had been getting some 32xx series WEG upgrades recently, so it should be out from the list. Whereas the JIS gets the older VO3x to replacing the outgoing LO3x and NAC VO2x. I dun think there are any plans to deploy WEG for JIS services less BSEP.163's downgrade was mainly due to the other HGDEP services that either went WAB or fleet add. As 163 was not WAB then, it was at a losing end. The introduction of 34A fleet add caused 163 to lose 1 EEV to a MK3, followed by 156's WAB implementation that cause another downgrade to a MK4 DM. There was also not even an upgrade for 163 when the MK3s were replaced by Citaros. Until it was one month away before 163 turned WAB.70 is more of AMDEP deployment problem, despite a number of spare K230UBs. I believe that it is not so difficult to get the MK4s replaced by any spare WSD. For the non WAB DDs I understand, I have no issues with this. And it seems like the Citaros on 70 replaced K230UBs instead of the MK4s (I still see 2625K and 2801T these days), which is somehow illogical. Worse till 891X come in when 1986A left. That is why I am rather upset over 70's fleet earlier on. -
Originally posted by SBS8676Z:132 had been getting some 32xx series WEG upgrades recently, so it should be out from the list. Whereas the JIS gets the older VO3x to replacing the outgoing LO3x and NAC VO2x. I dun think there are any plans to deploy WEG for JIS services less BSEP.163's downgrade was mainly due to the other HGDEP services that either went WAB or fleet add. As 163 was not WAB then, it was at a losing end. The introduction of 34A fleet add caused 163 to lose 1 EEV to a MK3, followed by 156's WAB implementation that cause another downgrade to a MK4 DM. There was also not even an upgrade for 163 when the MK3s were replaced by Citaros. Until it was one month away before 163 turned WAB.70 is more of AMDEP deployment problem, despite a number of spare K230UBs. I believe that it is not so difficult to get the MK4s replaced by any spare WSD. For the non WAB DDs I understand, I have no issues with this. And it seems like the Citaros on 70 replaced K230UBs instead of the MK4s (I still see 2625K and 2801T these days), which is somehow illogical. Worse till 891X come in when 1986A left. That is why I am rather upset over 70's fleet earlier on.
I agree with you for 70. 70's distant should be able to cope with kubs. Citaros should go to svc which run around approx 50km like 24 and 53. Though 24 dosen't hit 50km, the distance covered by it is 49.5km, whereas 53 is 53.3km or 53.4km, depending on where it parks at Bishan Int.
And all those rotten KUBs stay in AMDEP to get rotten? Throw to 70 and bus svcs that are wab but with low wab quota.