Guess the next WAB service(s) thread
-
Originally posted by SBS8676Z:
Can make use of those former SLBP K230UBs as well. Another way is grab those Citaros from 82 or 83.
Most probably 2647Y will stay due to ad, the other 2 Striders time to leave 372.
Possible, iirc a fb group said that too many bustops along 83 routes are not wheelchair accessible to be wab.
-
Originally posted by SBS6305H:
Possible, iirc a fb group said that too many bustops along 83 routes are not wheelchair accessible to be wab.
It is true.
-
Originally posted by SBS8676Z:
Can make use of those former SLBP K230UBs as well. Another way is grab those Citaros from 82 or 83.
Most probably 2647Y will stay due to ad, the other 2 Striders time to leave 372.
2647Y's ad has expired.
-
Seems that once this WAB wave kicks in, it is left only with 222 and 262 under the feeder/townlink group for SBST that is not wab.
-
WAB wish list
SMRT : 804, 812
-
Originally posted by d143b2:
WAB wish list
SMRT : 804, 812
Unless there's 4 OCs and 3 normal bendy can WAB for 804.812 need at least 4 WAB bendies
-
Originally posted by SBS2656X:
Looks like 159 isn't that ready for WAB yet - HGDEP is in lack of citaros to replace MORE of the DMs and some striders.
I wonder which citaro will perm 372? Maybe SBS6226C and SBS6227A
Bear in mind that with the four Citaros recently added, HGDEP just needed to add in the SP KUBs SLBP gave and 159 would hit the quota. 82 and 83 can give some Citaros to 159/372 too.
But, as I have so many times repeated, 27 is a high-loading WAB service. Cannot anyhow just take its perms away.
-
Originally posted by SMB128B:
But, as I have so many times repeated, 27 is a high-loading WAB service. Cannot anyhow just take its perms away.
27 would have been the very first candidate to get WEGs, if not because of the height restriction at CGA.
-
Originally posted by carbikebus:
Unless there's 4 OCs and 3 normal bendy can WAB for 804.812 need at least 4 WAB bendies
...
most of the A22s are on WLDEP
there is some OCs cameoing on 812 (what are they doing?)
-
Originally posted by SMB128B:
Bear in mind that with the four Citaros recently added, HGDEP just needed to add in the SP KUBs SLBP gave and 159 would hit the quota. 82 and 83 can give some Citaros to 159/372 too.
But, as I have so many times repeated, 27 is a high-loading WAB service. Cannot anyhow just take its perms away.
HGDEP should replace the citaros with KUBs.
-
Originally posted by SBS2656X:
HGDEP should replace the citaros with KUBs.
Citaros are more suitable for ARBP IMO...
Sad, my dear SBS6148U just went to HGDEP like that...
... -
Originally posted by TIB 501 D:
Citaros are more suitable for ARBP IMO...
Sad, my dear SBS6148U just went to HGDEP like that...
...Not a bad ride down 325
-
Originally posted by SBS2656X:
Not a bad ride down 325
Good for you then
!Probably 325 needs the speed!
-
Originally posted by d143b2:
...
most of the A22s are on WLDEP
there is some OCs cameoing on 812 (what are they doing?)
812 got OC crossover in the morning..
-
853 lah. Send all the Lances to scrapeyard and let AMDEP take all the MANs from WLDEP.
-
Originally posted by SBS8155K:
853 lah. Send all the Lances to scrapeyard and let AMDEP take all the MANs from WLDEP.
If AMDEP isn't lazy enough, They can
Too bad they are lazy enough to take in MANs, other than the BSEP editions of it.
-
Originally posted by SMB128B:
But, as I have so many times repeated, 27 is a high-loading WAB service. Cannot anyhow just take its perms away.
The thing regarding Sv 27 has to do with utilising the standing space. Would they want more Citaros but sacrifice the greater standing space of the KUBs? That's why most of the CGA svcs have more KUB perms than Citaro perms (24, 27, 34) for the greater standing space of KUBs, though I've no idea how 53 managed to survive with that many Citaros.
-
Originally posted by TIB1218R:
812 got OC crossover in the morning..
from which service
-
Originally posted by TIB783G:
If AMDEP isn't lazy enough, They can
Too bad they are lazy enough to take in MANs, other than the BSEP editions of it.
AMDEP soon will take in MAN bus. Patience -
Amdep not lazy but with that kind of spacing how you expect they take in new buses?Park where?Eunos int?
-
Originally posted by carbikebus:
Amdep not lazy but with that kind of spacing how you expect they take in new buses?Park where?Eunos int?
wait for lance to scrap and replace 1 on 1 basis, or expand ONP at sembawang until a more permenant solution to their parking mess can be found
-
Originally posted by TIB868X:
wait for lance to scrap and replace 1 on 1 basis, or expand ONP at sembawang until a more permenant solution to their parking mess can be found
Most of the lances are in Lor 1 Geylang Ter...
All with SMRT logo spray-painted black and with strings tied around them. -
Originally posted by carbikebus:
Amdep not lazy but with that kind of spacing how you expect they take in new buses?Park where?Eunos int?
Kick more lances out, Give those ex-WL O4s like 757H 802K etc back to WLDEP, and hope WLDEP doesn't dily-dally with those useless L113s and kick them out straight away.
-
Originally posted by SBS6301T:
from which service
From 171, SMB26L.
-
Heard that certain svc like 851/853 would be under the new Woodlands Bus park? True? :o