Why are u so persistent increating this thread?
Originally posted by SMB128B:Why are u so persistent increating this thread?
Originally posted by SBS9067A:
'Cause you requested for a lock in the first one? So, I have to make second one.
It's not only SMB128B who wants the thread to be locked. There are many reasons why this should be locked:
1. This topic is wasting a lot of space.
2. This topic is full of fantasies that have no effect on the transport system
3. This topic had made many people feel disgusting
4. Because C151 039/040 kept doing something that has no relationship to deployments at all (like prescribing female clothing to boys).
It's likely if the part 1 thread is locked for a good reason, when you created the part 2 thread again the moderator will still lock it.
Also, I encouraged you to lock it just for you. Even in the part 1 thread, C151 039/040 not only insulted me as a man, but he even insulted you as the thread starter. If you wish that you shall not be insulted again, this topic shall really go locked.
And I did ask for the moderator to lock the part 1 thread, but I don't know what happened, probably that they did not see my post until they saw SMB128B's post. So the one we had to thank is surely SMB128B.
Originally posted by Gus.chong:It's not only SMB128B who wants the thread to be locked. There are many reasons why this should be locked:
1. This topic is wasting a lot of space.
2. This topic is full of fantasies that have no effect on the transport system
3. This topic had made many people feel disgusting
4. Because C151 039/040 kept doing something that has no relationship to deployments at all (like prescribing female clothing to boys).
Answers to your question :
1. Since when forums have XXgb/mb??
2. There's other fourm also have no effect on transport system
3. I don't feel disgust leh??
4. So be it? Why close the thread? Ban the user lahh?
2. This topic is full of fantasies that have no effect on the transport system
2. There's other fourm also have no effect on transport system
One talks about this topic, one talks on other forums.
Originally posted by SMB66X:Answers to your question :
1. Since when forums have XXgb/mb??
2. There's other fourm also have no effect on transport system
3. I don't feel disgust leh??
4. So be it? Why close the thread? Ban the user lahh?
1. Forums might get lagged if the space is occupied by many threads.
2. Forum is forum, topic is topic. They are different.
3. I just feel disgusted. That's all. Don't counter my reply with a reason that you don't feel disgusted.
4. Some people don't like your fourth reply because they cannot let those kids to keep toying us. Closing the thread is a right choice and I don't know whether users can be banned.
Originally posted by Gus.chong:It's not only SMB128B who wants the thread to be locked. There are many reasons why this should be locked:
1. This topic is wasting a lot of space.
2. This topic is full of fantasies that have no effect on the transport system
3. This topic had made many people feel disgusting
4. Because C151 039/040 kept doing something that has no relationship to deployments at all (like prescribing female clothing to boys).It's likely if the part 1 thread is locked for a good reason, when you created the part 2 thread again the moderator will still lock it.
Also, I encouraged you to lock it just for you. Even in the part 1 thread, C151 039/040 not only insulted me as a man, but he even insulted you as the thread starter. If you wish that you shall not be insulted again, this topic shall really go locked.
And I did ask for the moderator to lock the part 1 thread, but I don't know what happened, probably that they did not see my post until they saw SMB128B's post. So the one we had to thank is surely SMB128B.
Originally posted by SBS9067A:Anyways, I don’t think Volvo Super Olympians will go on JIS services, not until a year like 2017 or something.
By then they r ready to retire liao loh...
Originally posted by SMB128B:By then they r ready to retire liao loh...
The VSOs were registered in 2002/2003. I think they will retire earlier than that.
Originally posted by Gus.chong:The VSOs were registered in 2002/2003. I think they will retire earlier than that.
personal opinion: de-register on 2020-2021
Originally posted by Gus.chong:The VSOs were registered in 2002/2003. I think they will retire earlier than that.
Originally posted by SBS9067A:
Wha... If they were registered in 2002/2003, they would retire from 2019 to 2022.
I hope so, but since SBS9888Y was burnt, I think they were retire earlier to prevent any fires.
Originally posted by SBS9067A:
Wha... If they were registered in 2002/2003, they would retire from 2019 to 2022.
The VSOs will likely be retired before 2020, or retrofitted with a ramp and wheelchair space. This is because LTA has already requested for all public buses to be WAB by 2020.
Originally posted by Bus Stopping:The VSOs will likely be retired before 2020, or retrofitted with a ramp and wheelchair space. This is because LTA has already requested for all public buses to be WAB by 2020.
VSO/Tridents is possible for JIS in 2-3 years time
Originally posted by carbikebus:VSO/Tridents is possible for JIS in 2-3 years time
Originally posted by C151 039/040:
CDGE and Wright B9TLs for JIS after all Volvo Olympians is gone. For 160 and 170, Citaros after all DM3500s is gone.
Originally posted by SBS9067A:
So Scania K230UB is unlikely to be deployed on 160, 170 and 170X, eh?
It is likely if 3rd brake lights are installed on them.
Originally posted by Gus.chong:It is likely if 3rd brake lights are installed on them.
Originally posted by SBS9067A:
Yeah.
And also, the Scania K230UBs will ply on 160 & 170 once the DM3500 goes in 2019.
Anyways...
Sunlong [unknown model]
It will never go to 30, I hope. Or to 160/170/170X.
Originally posted by SBS9067A:Anyways...
Sunlong [unknown model]
It will never go to 30, I hope. Or to 160/170/170X.
I hope it will go to 333 or 335 after perming 185, 502 and 334 consecutively for some time.