Suspected Redeployments (Part 2)
-
Originally posted by SinkTel:
Yeap, 922 the only perm out today, will need to observe further as 6170 and 6171 takes turn to cameo since last week and its strange that they take out 922 instead of the 2 mk3. By the way, U know what happened to 8520?
Exactly, i thought they would take the Mk3s out first but if 922R is really out, then i guess BN is in desperate need for SP Mk4s to put into those services with departing Mk3s this month.
Nopes, I hadn't seen 8520P elsewhere as well. Didn't see it on cameo nor on 29. Could be sleeping in workshop or on cameo elsewhere just that no one reported the cameo. Keep a lookout for it too. -
yes fleet add. Just need to check for sticker.Originally posted by SBS8730A:SBS8969D
(BRBP SP
BRBP 235) Suspect fleet add as all 5
buses were present during evening peak. Monitoring
required. Ever since 235 got amended, bus have been moving slowly, fleet add to cope with the slow moving buses
-
Originally posted by ahjack 77:
SBS2665U is still perm as SV101 for the Non-WAB slot. However, it is interchangable with other Serangoon Service under the same route group.
SBS943E is the replacement for one of the MKIII (perhaps 811C); Replacement on 158 would most likely be a citaro.
On the other hand, to the best of my knowledge, 595B was not replaced by any buses after it deregistered/left SV82 due to change of route & hence reduction of one trip iirc.Please correct me if imma wrong. For more detailed&confirmed deplyment on SV82 refer to actual thread. :D
Eh yes. You're right with 595B. 82 cut 1 or 2 bus if i rmb correctly. 595 wasnt replaced at all due to the change in route.
Agree with 2665U and 943E's status also/replacement.
-
Suspect:
TIB642E
[WL 852 > WL SP > WL 178].TIB662Y
[WL 167 > WL SP].TIB663U
[WL 980/856 > WL SP/856]. -
Suspect:
TIB912B
(AMDEP SP) (AMDEP 961)SMB66X
(KJDEP SP/188R)
(KJDEP 67/188R) -
suspect:
SBS 3036D
BB SP > BB 147
-
TIB464C (WLDEP/WRBP 911) to (WLDEP SP)
Only once i saw it on 911 duty S101. Other days jumping buses
-
SBS8720D
(HGDEP 27/EB8)
(HGDEP 89/EB8)Seen for nearly a week
-
Got the feeling that SBS6143H is now perm HGDEP 34, based on HGDEP's trend of Citaro deployments in sequence...
-
TIB1214B
Suspected (KJDEP 172) >> (KJDEP 302)
-
Post removed
-
Originally posted by SBS7557R:
Don't suspect any more bus deployments. Let the user TIB783G confirm ALL redeployments related to SMRT buses and the user SBS9631X confirm ALL redeployments from now since they said so in the Redeployments thread.
THIS STUPID THREAD CAN LOCK LIAO, MODS PLEASE LOCK IT
If you don't know what to confirm, then you don't have to post. I was just asking if your redeployments spottings were based on perm stix or pure observation, and you didn't answer? For AMDEP, confirmed deployments can use perm stix. BNDEP wise have to spot for weeks. That's all. So I don't understand why you got so pissed. Seriously.
-
Originally posted by SMB128B:
SBS8720D
(HGDEP 27/EB8)
(HGDEP 89/EB8)Seen for nearly a week
Yeah I spotted it too, but seems like a S shift slot from the timings I spotted it. Or did you spot it during noon time too?
-
TIB760Y
(WLDEP SP) (WLDEP 75)I saw it operating frequently.
-
Originally posted by SBS7557R:
Don't suspect any more bus deployments. Let the user TIB783G confirm ALL redeployments related to SMRT buses and the user SBS9631X confirm ALL redeployments from now since they said so in the Redeployments thread.
THIS STUPID THREAD CAN LOCK LIAO, MODS PLEASE LOCK IT
-
Originally posted by SBS7557R:
Don't suspect any more bus deployments. Let the user TIB783G confirm ALL redeployments related to SMRT buses and the user SBS9631X confirm ALL redeployments from now since they said so in the Redeployments thread.
THIS STUPID THREAD CAN LOCK LIAO, MODS PLEASE LOCK IT
Stupid? Only you who don't even know how to confirm redeployments are stupid.
This thread exist for a reason. You have to ask the one for the reason to create this thread.
-
Originally posted by SBS7557R:
Don't suspect any more bus deployments. Let the user TIB783G confirm ALL redeployments related to SMRT buses and the user SBS9631X confirm ALL redeployments from now since they said so in the Redeployments thread.
THIS STUPID THREAD CAN LOCK LIAO, MODS PLEASE LOCK IT
Look, I don't know where you get where your SMRT deployments infomations from, But right from the start SMRT ones has really been messy, especially the whole WL group deployments, It has been really getting out of hand. And with the mess lies ahead I wondered if you had really observed? Yes I admit I can't cover every WL/KJ/AM group deployments of all, Unless I have something that is of convienience to me, Then I will cover the group of my choice every weekend.
If I can, I can do it myself. Don't worry. I can sit there and observe the fleets myself.
-
suspect 9331L perm 43 replacing 2693M
today on 43 as well as yest..
-
There should be a transfer of Mk4s from hgdep to bbdep within the next 2 months.. unless slbp transfers more Mk4s to bbdep first.
-
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:
Yeah I spotted it too, but seems like a S shift slot from the timings I spotted it. Or did you spot it during noon time too?
yes. always around afternoon time.
-
Originally posted by service_238:
There should be a transfer of Mk4s from hgdep to bbdep within the next 2 months.. unless slbp transfers more Mk4s to bbdep first.
What about the extra Citaros BBDEP currently have? Not suitable for 92 & 200 and all those services uh?
-
Originally posted by service_238:
There should be a transfer of Mk4s from hgdep to bbdep within the next 2 months.. unless slbp transfers more Mk4s to bbdep first.
What is the main reason for the transfer? Just curious...
If HGDEP really is to transfer out the MK4s, means some Citaros/K230UBs from BBDEP got to go over. -
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:
What about the extra Citaros BBDEP currently have? Not suitable for 92 & 200 and all those services uh?
Add on to 191 as well
At most BBDEP will pull out some MK4s from the higher demand trunk routes and replace with Citaros, then the MK4s will take over the MK3s on the a/m services.
-
the base assumption is those buona vista services will not get new buses this year. the second assumption is bbdep does not have enough mk4s to deploy on these services. If like what 8676 said bbdep pluck out mk4s from existing services and citaros replacing them (like 16 and 48, and maybe for 175) then the transfer may or may not happen depending on how things are.
-
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:
What about the extra Citaros BBDEP currently have? Not suitable for 92 & 200 and all those services uh?
I think sv92 might not be able to use citaros due to the steep slopes at Mt Sinai area. As for sv200, it once had a citaro and recently a kub running on it and it runs around holland v area..perhaps possible. Sv93 could do with citaros too and AR could use some of its striders n dm3500s on other AR services. Same for sv151 & 156 on BB side.
