Effective 16/ 10
7, 10, 12, 21, 48, 51, 54, 62, 63, 91, 97, 143, 147, 161, 175, 182, 191, 192, 193....
24/10
183
62, 97, 143, 147 add trips.
51, 161 redux
Seems like some is new bus stop distance info.
mmm...
Bus stop name changing
Portsdown Road (18151): Opp One North Stn
Portsdown Road (18159): One North Stn
Ayer Rajah Ave (18051): One North Stn
Ayer Rajah Ave (18059): Opp One North Stn
Dunearn Rd (41029): Opp Botanic Gardens Stn
West Coast Highway (16229): Haw Par Villa Stn
West Coast Highway (16221): Opp Haw Par Villa Stn
Pasir Panjang Rd (15191): Pasir Panjang Stn
Telok Blangah Rd (14161): Opp Telok Blangah Stn
Telok Blangah Rd (14169): Telok Blangah Stn
Holland Ave (11419): Holland Village Stn
Farrer Rd (11111): Opp Farrer Rd Stn
Farrer Rd (1119): Farrer Rd Stn
Sth Buona Vista Rd (15131): Kent Ridge Stn
Sth Buona Vista Rd (15139): Opp Kent Ridge Stn
Pasir Panjang Rd (16011): Opp Haw Par Villa Stn
Pasir Panjang Rd (16019): Haw Par Villa Stn
just wondering, isnt 93 affected? i mean since it duplicated most of the CCL stations except eunos there
Originally posted by bus555:just wondering, isnt 93 affected? i mean since it duplicated most of the CCL stations except eunos there
they wont adjust the service/frequency so fast.. still have to monitor.. further, some ppl would rather take bus then go and squeeze at the circle line.. further sv93 does not follow entirely the CCL route.. if u stay at braddell road, will u go take sv93 or circle line?
look at sv143, duplicate the CCL from haw par villa to Harbourfront, then duplicate NEL from Harbourfront to Dhoby Ghaut, then duplicate NSL to Toa Payoh? but they still add trips to it? sv143 duplicate the MRT line even more than Sv93, then should remove Sv143?
and seem like that after the previous two transport ministers gone case, there is no more mentioning of cutting down the long routes or any more rerouting of routes etc? they took few years to review all the routes and they only manage to reroute 3 service (76/315/410?)
Originally posted by lemon1974:they wont adjust the service/frequency so fast.. still have to monitor.. further, some ppl would rather take bus then go and squeeze at the circle line.. further sv93 does not follow entirely the CCL route.. if u stay at braddell road, will u go take sv93 or circle line?
look at sv143, duplicate the CCL from haw par villa to Harbourfront, then duplicate NEL from Harbourfront to Dhoby Ghaut, then duplicate NSL to Toa Payoh? but they still add trips to it? sv143 duplicate the MRT line even more than Sv93, then should remove Sv143?
and seem like that after the previous two transport ministers gone case, there is no more mentioning of cutting down the long routes or any more rerouting of routes etc? they took few years to review all the routes and they only manage to reroute 3 service (76/315/410?)
True tat because it not near mrt ma... but then most of the svc in 2003 was either withdrawn or amanded when NEL opens.. like 81 amanded to Serangoon old svc 85 withdrawn then 119 cover it... somehow kinda wrong move yea?
Originally posted by bus555:True tat because it not near mrt ma... but then most of the svc in 2003 was either withdrawn or amanded when NEL opens.. like 81 amanded to Serangoon old svc 85 withdrawn then 119 cover it... somehow kinda wrong move yea?
that time they think MRT can take in all the passengers mah...esp when NEL open, no one taking... but then when the MRT get more crowded and when it breakdown more often, they realised that they still need buses....