Originally posted by carbikebus:I've no objection for some BPJ Services under WL cause of the distance from depot,Ditto for CCK services.WL should take 190,925 and 927 too.Then 178 and 187 can be partly share among KJ/WL.As for 171 should be fully under AM cause both directions all in favour of AM.852 should be partly KJ/AM if we're talking about fuel economy.167 should be fully WL then the remaining buses should go to 171.857 can be under AM if 106 AM duty to be handed fully to KJ.965 AM side buses also can go 857.Then again AM can do ONP @ Sembawang for 980/882 beside few other services.
Is Sembawang space fully utilised for ONP!?
Originally posted by carbikebus:As for 171 should be fully under AM cause both directions all in favour of AM.852 should be partly KJ/AM if we're talking about fuel economy.167 should be fully WL then the remaining buses should go to 171.857 can be under AM if 106 AM duty to be handed fully to KJ.965 AM side buses also can go 857.Then again AM can do ONP @ Sembawang for 980/882 beside few other services.
171 shouldn't stay in AM in the first place. Woodlands should have a fair share of it, Not as if all trips starting in MCT anyway and WL is a good place to place this service. 167 and 106 are clearly due to historical reasons. 852, Should stay at WL and not to any other depots. 857 I don't see a prob with its current depot.
Originally posted by Acx1688:sv966 have start trips from opp Parkway parade every morning approx 5 buses layover from start till 630am...
858 dun ve start from CGA?!
So the first bus at PP starts at?
Originally posted by TIB 781 L:
So the first bus at PP starts at?
545am...
Originally posted by Acx1688:545am...
Cannot leh unless they allow the space at GLDEP to be used.
Those that start their trip at UEC,Eunos and Bedok should use the GLDEP as OVNP space, But cannot due to space constraints.
TIB442R on 177 today. Is TIB807Y on 177 also?
Originally posted by Ngweitong:190 & 700 SHOULD NOT be transferred to WLDEP
Finally someone agrees with me that BPJ and CCK should not be touched to WLDEP.
To conclude,
Services 75 and 184 have their fleet reduction.
75 only has 10 A/P buses + 7S, compared to 19 to 20 last time
184 only has 6 A/P buses, compared to 8 A/P last time
Encourage people to take 960 instead? Don't really understand why 184 needs fleet reduction. Last Sat I took 553D on 184, many people boarded at Clementi Stn.
Hope can make use of ex-KJ 75 DAFs for fleet add of 975.
Originally posted by TIB657M:
Encourage people to take 960 instead? Don't really understand why 184 needs fleet reduction. Last Sat I took 553D on 184, many people boarded at Clementi Stn.
So where does the majority of the crowd alight?
Originally posted by TIB657M:Hope can make use of ex-KJ 75 DAFs for fleet add of 975.
But would not that mean an overshot for the 975 fleets?
Originally posted by TIB 781 L:
Finally someone agrees with me that BPJ and CCK should not be touched to WLDEP.
Originally posted by TIB 781 L:
So where does the majority of the crowd alight?
If say about weekends, Clementi Station also. I mean for 184. In my opinion, people will prefer 184 to 75 to go NP due to shorter distance provided.
In obvious from BPJ to Marina Ctr, 960 provides faster way than 75 and 171.
In obvious, from WLDEP to Bukit Batok is further than from WLDEP to Choa Chu Kang.
The distance between Choa Chu Kang and Woodlands is: 7.51km
The distance betwen Bukit Panjang and Woodlands is: 7.32km
So, is it okay to put 188 and 925 as WLDEP controlled instead of 75 and 184?
I think during weekends. 184 frequency will keep more than 15 minutes as they only run 6 buses instead of 8....
Originally posted by TIB 781 L:
171 shouldn't stay in AM in the first place.
882 also.
Originally posted by TIB 781 L:
171 shouldn't stay in AM in the first place.
882 also.
Originally posted by TIB 781 L:
Cannot leh unless they allow the space at GLDEP to be used.Those that start their trip at UEC,Eunos and Bedok should use the GLDEP as OVNP space, But cannot due to space constraints.
wat cannot?! wat talkin you!?
sv966 does start 545am at parkway parade and it is a fact, the bus stop opp Parkway Parade has a sv966 first/last bus stop plate.
GLBP have space for parking, CSS svcs used to park there...
Originally posted by Ngweitong:
CCK, BBT and BP int services should be controlled by KJDEP, since some BB and CCK services practise overnight parking, no issues of over crowding... WLDEP to control SBW & WDL services, and AMDEP to control YI services, for those 67 985 169 all these can remain partial control of AMDEP
Can someone clear up my understanding of whether Bukit Panjang, CCK has ONP!?!
Originally posted by Acx1688:Can someone clear up my understanding of whether Bukit Panjang, CCK has ONP!?!
Bukit Panjang NO ONP.
Choa Chu Kang YES ONP.
Originally posted by Junyang700:Bukit Panjang NO ONP.
Choa Chu Kang YES ONP.
Thank you for enlightening.
If tts the case, BKP should be cvt to have ONP[not for me to decide] since KJ svcs are doing ROADSIDE PARKING...
By having ONP,svcs who do morning down trip, eg. sv960, sv187 will be able to save fuel and time.
Furthermore, there is sufficient space for bendies n rigids
Are BPJ feeders affected? This weekend 922 permers gone liao.
Originally posted by dan474:Are BPJ feeders affected? This weekend 922 permers gone liao.
No......
Originally posted by TIB657M:To conclude,
Services 75 and 184 have their fleet reduction.
75 only has 10 A/P buses + 7S, compared to 19 to 20 last time
184 only has 6 A/P buses, compared to 8 A/P last time
Encourage people to take 960 instead? Don't really understand why 184 needs fleet reduction. Last Sat I took 553D on 184, many people boarded at Clementi Stn.
75 and 184 did NOT have a reduction in their fleet. Both still have the same number of buses. It's just the inaccuracy of information on SGWiki.